FUDforum 2.6.11

From FUDforum Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

FUDforum 2.6.11 was released on 18 February 2005. This release is no longer supported. Please upgrade to FUDforum 3.0.0 ASAP.

Changes

A small, but annoying bug has been discovered in FUDforum 2.6.10. Some of the e-mail messages sent by the forum in common localizations duplicate the forum URL, causing the link to be invalid. This release fixes this bug and 3 other non-critical issues.

  • Fixed bug that would cause displaying of forum listing for compact view categories who's parent category is collapsed.
  • Fixed another compact category bug, which is triggered when main category only had compact categories.
  • Fixed bug primarily affecting conversion script where by there could be an attempt to create an already existing lock table.
  • Multibyte notes for wordwrap.
  • Fixed duplicate instances of {FULL_ROOT} in some translations.

External links

FUDforum versions (* = latest stable version; + = release candidate; ? = development version)

1.0.0 | 1.1.0 | 1.1.1 | 1.2.0 | 1.2.1 | 1.2.2 | 1.2.3 | 1.2.4 | 1.2.5 | 1.2.6 | 1.2.7 | 1.2.8
2.0.0 | 2.0.1 | 2.0.2 | 2.1.0 | 2.1.1 | 2.1.2 | 2.1.3 | 2.2.0 | 2.2.1 | 2.2.2 | 2.2.3 | 2.2.4 | 2.2.5 | 2.3.0 | 2.3.1 | 2.3.2 | 2.3.3 | 2.3.4 | 2.3.5 | 2.3.6 | 2.3.7 | 2.3.8 | 2.5.0 | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 | 2.5.3 | 2.6.0 | 2.6.1 | 2.6.2 | 2.6.3 | 2.6.4 | 2.6.5 | 2.6.6 | 2.6.7 | 2.6.8 | 2.6.9 | 2.6.10 | 2.6.11 | 2.6.12 | 2.6.13 | 2.6.14 | 2.6.15 | 2.7.0 | 2.7.1 | 2.7.2 | 2.7.3 | 2.7.4 | 2.7.5 | 2.7.6 | 2.7.7 | 2.8.0 | 2.8.1
3.0.0 | 3.0.1 | 3.0.2 | 3.0.3 | 3.0.4 | 3.0.5 | 3.0.6 | 3.0.7 | 3.0.8 | 3.0.9 | 3.1.0 (*) | 3.1.1 (?)

Retrieved from "http://cvs.prohost.org/index.php?title=FUDforum_2.6.11"
Languages
Personal tools
This is a cached copy of the requested page, and may not be up to date.

Sorry! This site is experiencing technical difficulties.
Try waiting a few minutes and reloading.

(Can't contact the database server: Cannot return last error, no db connection)

You can try searching via Google in the meantime.
Note that their indexes of our content may be out of date.